General
Information About The Fund
The Board
of Governors of the
Health Care Stabilization Fund welcomes you to the Kansas
health care delivery system. Information presented in this
web site will help you understand:
-
the Health Care Stabilization
Fund;
-
which health care providers
participate in the Health Care Stabilization
Fund;
-
how health care providers
participate in the Health Care Stabilization
Fund;
-
what coverage is provided by
the Health Care Stabilization Fund; and,
-
where you can get additional
assistance with any matter related to the basic
professional liability insurance or the Health Care
Stabilization Fund.
Administration of the Health Care
Stabilization Fund is the responsibility of the Fund Board
of Governors. This board is comprised of ten members who are
representatives of the health care providers who participate
in the Health Care Stabilization Fund. In their
administration of the Fund, every attempt is made to
maximize its efficiency, effectiveness and service to its
participating health care providers.
Any health care provider who
needs additional assistance in understanding or meeting the
requirements of this Kansas law is encouraged to contact the
Topeka office of the Fund.
Brief
History Of The Fund
Kansas health care providers were
confronted with medical professional liability problems in
the mid 1970s that resulted from changes in the legal,
medical, social and economic environments. The impact of
changes adversely affected the availability or cost of
medical professional liability coverage for certain classes
of health care providers. In 1975 and 1976, representatives
of the Kansas health care provider groups, the Insurance
Department and the legislature worked together to resolve
these problems by creating the Health Care Provider
Insurance Availability Act. This 1976 law included the
following major provisions:
-
created the Health Care
Stabilization Fund to provide excess professional
liability coverage for defined health care
providers;
-
mandated a basic professional
liability insurance requirement for defined health care
providers;
-
established an availability
plan to provide the required basic professional liability
insurance coverage for those health care providers who
could not obtain such coverage from one of the commercial
insurers.
Although the availability
problems do not exist today, the unpredictable nature of
medical professional liability coverage availability, the
unique beneficial coverage provisions of the Fund, and the
actuarial soundness have warranted the continuation of the
Kansas Health Care Stabilization Fund.
Definition
of Health Care Providers
The Fund law includes the
following categories of health care providers in its
definition of health care provider:
-
Medical Doctors and Doctors
of Osteopathy who are licensed or hold a temporary permit
issued by the Kansas Board of Healing
Arts
-
Persons engaged in a
postgraduate training program which is approved by the
Kansas Board of Healing Arts
-
Chiropractors
-
Podiatrists
-
Registered Nurse
Anesthetists, including temporary
authorizations
-
Medical Care Facilities
(special hospitals, general hospitals, surgical centers
or recuperation centers)
-
Mental Health Clinics or
Centers
-
Psychiatric Hospitals
(selected facilities only)
-
Dentists who have been
certified by the Kansas Board of Healing Arts to
administer anesthetics
-
Kansas Professional
Corporations or Partnerships of defined health care
providers
-
Kansas Limited Liability
Companies organized for the purpose of rendering
professional services by its health care provider
members
-
Kansas not-for-profit
corporations organized for the purpose of rendering
professional services by persons who are health care
providers
-
A nonprofit corporation organized to administer the graduate
medical education programs of community hospitals or medical care
facilities affiliated with the university of Kansas school of
medicine
Health care
providers, in accordance with the provisions of the Fund
law, are required to maintain basic professional liability
insurance coverage, pay the Fund surcharge and are eligible
for professional liability coverage from the Fund. Please refer to
subsection (f) of K.S.A. 2001 Supp. 40-3401 for the full definition of
the term "health care provider".
Fund
Compliance Guidelines For Health Care
Providers
Health care providers who
engage in rendering professional services in Kansas are
subject to the basic professional liability coverage and
Fund surcharge requirements. This applies to health care
providers who are Kansas residents and to non-resident
health care providers who are rendering professional
services in Kansas.
-
Resident health care
providers obtain the basic professional liability
insurance coverage from an insurer that is authorized to
write business in Kansas or the Health Care Provider
Insurance Availability Plan. The insurer is responsible
for calculating the amount of surcharge based on the Fund
coverage limit selected by the provider, the rating
classification code of the provider and the number of
years the provider has been in compliance with the Fund.
The insurer collects the Fund surcharge payment along
with the premium for the basic professional liability
insurance coverage and remits the surcharge to the Fund
without any reductions for commissions, collection or
processing expenses.
-
Non-resident health care
providers who render professional services in Kansas
comply with the Fund directly by completing the Fund
non-resident compliance form. The surcharge payment is
submitted to the Fund with the completed non-resident
compliance form. Individual non-residents, or their
representatives may contact the Health Care Stabilization
Fund to obtain the necessary compliance form and related
instructions.
-
Health care providers who
live in Kansas and hold an active Kansas license or
registration, but practice solely in another state may
also be required to comply with the Fund. Providers are
afforded Fund coverage for their out-of-state practice
even though they do not render services in Kansas. If,
however, you do not wish to maintain Fund compliance or
pay the surcharge, you may discontinue your Kansas
professional license or registration, or change your
Kansas licensing status in a manner that is acceptable to
your licensing agency.
-
Health care providers that
are denied basic coverage from the voluntary insurance
market may obtain basic coverage from the Kansas
Health Care Provider Insurance Availability
Plan.
These general guidelines should
be helpful to most health care providers; however, health
care providers may call or write to the Fund for additional
assistance. Our telephone number and address are on the home
page of this web site. Click here for a listing of state
professional associations and Kansas licensing
agencies you may find
helpful in resolving your individual
situation.
What
Coverage Is Provided By The
Fund?
Excess professional liability
coverage is the primary function of the Fund. Three
different Fund excess coverage levels are available to
health care providers and discussed in detail in other
sections of the FAQs.
Typically, the Funds excess
professional liability coverage is triggered
when the basic professional liability insurers
projected loss exposure exceeds $200,000; however, the
Funds legal staff monitors all claims and suits filed
against Kansas health care providers and attends claim
settlement conferences even though the Funds coverage
has not yet been triggered. Because the Fund monitors all
professional liability claims brought against health care
providers, our legal staff can often assist providers who
become involved in a professional liability
claim.
Each of the available Fund
coverage limits are comprised of two dollar amounts. The
Fund coverage limits are $100,000/$300,000; $300,000/
$900,000 or $800,000/$2,400,000. Using the highest Fund
coverage as an example, the first dollar amount (e.g.,
$800,000) is the amount of loss payment available for each
claim. The second dollar amount (e.g., $2,400,000) is the
total annual amount of loss payments for all claims made
during a Fund coverage year. Fund coverage limits are always
excess over any other available professional liability
coverage. Claim expenses and defense costs are covered by
the Fund without any limitation.
In addition to this primary
purpose, the Fund law also provides for the following health
care provider professional liability coverage
features:
-
Requires all basic
professional liability insurers to include prior acts
coverage in their basic professional liability insurance
coverage. This provision of the law eliminates the need
for Kansas health care providers to purchase reporting
endorsement coverage (also known as tail
coverage) when changing basic professional liability
insurers.
-
Requires that all basic
professional liability insurers provide professional
liability insurance for the overall or total professional
services rendered by a Kansas health care provider. (In
most other states, insurers are allowed to sell
professional liability policies which may restrict the
professional liability coverage to a specific location or
the professional services rendered for a specific
employer. In other states, and prior to the existence of
the Kansas Fund law, many health care providers were
required to maintain two or more professional liability
insurance policies in order to cover their total
professional liability exposures.)
Note: Kansas resident health care providers rendering
professional services outside of Kansas or in another country should check with their basic
coverage insurance company. Some insurance companies have
included a "coverage territorial limitation" in their policy form.
Please refer to the following newsletter article for more
information: September
2003. As pointed out in the newsletter article, for an
active health care provider, the Fund must have basic coverage in
effect before the Fund becomes available to the health care
provider.
-
Fund tail
coverage for qualified inactive health care providers is
an important feature of the Fund. This coverage feature
eliminates the need for most health care providers to
purchase tail coverage for their discontinued
basic professional liability insurance when they become
inactive health care providers in Kansas.
-
The Fund law also provides
special self-insurance coverage provisions for the
full-time faculty members, foundations and individuals
engaged in the residency training programs of the
University of Kansas Medical Center and certain
affiliated programs.
-
The Fund provides the
financial back-up for the Health
Care Provider Insurance Availability
Plan. This
availability plan provides the required basic coverage
for those health care providers who can not locate the
required basic professional liability insurance from
commercial insurers.
The above coverage features of
the Fund are often overlooked by health care providers. The
benefits of these coverage features and other provisions are
key reasons why the Fund continues to exist. Without the
presence of the Fund, health care providers would be
confronted with basic professional liability coverage
issues, including claims made tail coverage
problems.
As of December 2003: Our professional liability insurance
market is measurably reduced from 2001 and earlier. Five
insurance companies are now providing the required basic professional
liability insurance for approximately 80% of our health care providers.
Some health care providers are confronted with only one or two
insurance companies that are willing to review applications for
coverage. This has resulted in more than 600 health care
providers finding it necessary to obtain their basic coverage from the
Health Care Provider Insurance Availability Plan. Two years ago
the Availability Plan was providing coverage to about 225 providers.
There is a listing of basic coverage insurance companies, with contact
information, on the Insurance Companies page
of this site.
The
Missouri Surcharge Rate Modification
Factor
The FY2008 Missouri surcharge rating factor has been changed from
20% to 25% (effective for new and renewal Fund coverage records
starting on and after July 1, 2007). This change was adopted by
the Fund Board of Governors based on the evaluation and recommendation
of the Towers-Perin Tillinghast (St. Louis, Mo. actuarial firm).
The following comments are from the April , 2007 actuarial review:
- "The data suggests that the 20% surcharge should actually be
higher (approximately 30%).", Finding, Missouri Surcharge, March 1,
2007 presentation to the Board of Governors.
- "The Board has also elected to increase the additional surcharge
applicable to Kansas residents who are licensed and render
professional services in Missouri. The additional surcharge is
increasing from 20% to 25%. The decision was based on actual
Fund data which shows that the providers who receive the Missouri
surcharge account for approximately 20.2% of Fund revenue in fiscal
years 2004-2006. However, these providers have accounted for
22.4% of paid losses and expenses, and 21.8% of current loss
reserves, from policies issued in fiscal year 2001 through fiscal
year 2007.", actuarial review dated March 20, 2007.
Click here
for the examples of the change in Fund surcharge for resident health
care providers who are licensed and render professional services in
Missouri.
The following information is being
continued from previous postings on the web page:
This
update message was posted to this site on July 25, 2000:
The July 1, 2000 effective date for the Missouri surcharge
rating factor has been implemented. Since the first
announcement of this surcharge rating factor in April of
1999, the Fund provided information to health care providers
via newsletters, presentations to the Kansas City area
medical societies, this Internet site and responded to
approximately fifteen written letters or e-mail
inquiries.
The Fund Board of Governors and staff member of the Fund
realize that no health care provider wishes to accept
surcharge cost increases or finds it easy to absorb
increases in surcharge costs. It is the hope of the Board of
Governors and Fund staff members that those Kansas resident
health care providers who are continuing to practice in
Missouri understand the reasons for the additional surcharge
cost. If not, those providers may wish to review the
following information.
FAQs
About The Additional 20% Missouri Surcharge Rate
Modification Factor
The following are questions that
have been asked regarding this surcharge rating modification
factor, followed by the answer
that was furnished by the
Fund.
Why is the Fund charging an
additional surcharge amount for those Kansas resident health
care providers who are licensed and rendering professional
services in Missouri?
ANSWER:
Both the April
1999 and the October
1999 newsletters included
articles regarding this change which becomes effective July
1, 2000. The following is a summary of other supporting
considerations:
-
Independent actuarial
recommendation
-
Equity of surcharge payments
for health care providers who do not practice outside
of Kansas
-
Legal
climate differences in
Missouri
-
Average loss
payments in Missouri
greater than Kansas
-
Number of Missouri cases
increasing
What health care providers will
be required to pay the additional Missouri surcharge rate
modification amount?
ANSWER:
Kansas resident health care providers who are licensed and
rendering professional services in Missouri.
Would it not be more reasonable
to apply the 20% additional Fund surcharge modification
factor only when the Kansas resident health care provider
rendered more than a specified percentage of their total
professional services in Missouri?
ANSWER: First, there is no
standard percent of practice rule being used uniformly by
all insurance companies. It is probable that some insurance
companies apply the highest premium rate applicable whenever
the insured is practicing in more than one rating territory
or state.
Furthermore, there is no written uniform rule or procedure
to follow for determining how to calculate the percent of
practice between rating territories. Would it be based on
time spent in each state? Number of patients seen in each
state? Percent of income derived from each state? Should
there be different percentages based on the type or kind of
services (e.g., surgical v. non-surgical) being rendered in
Missouri? Or some other method?
Second, if an acceptable percentage threshold could
be adopted, a modification factor larger than 20% may be
needed to pay for the increased losses stemming from those
providers who were below the threshold percentage.
Third, health care providers who practice less than
the specified percentage threshold in Missouri are not
immune from being named in a claim or suit in Missouri.
Also, they are not removed from the higher
Missouri loss potentials
should they be named in such a claim or suit arising from an
alleged injury occurring in Missouri.
Fourth, any professional service rendered in Missouri
by a Kansas resident health care provider exposes the Fund
to the higher Missouri loss costs should an alleged injury
occur from that professional service.
What is the additional Missouri
surcharge rate modification factor?
ANSWER:
20% for Kansas resident health care providers who are
licensed and rendering professional services in Missouri.
The additional 20% would be added to the amount shown in the
surcharge rates published by the Fund.
For example, if the published Fund rate for the individual
is $500, then add $100 (20% of the $500) for being licensed
and rendering professional services in Missouri for a total
of $600. The following table has some addition
examples.
|
Example Provider
(All with $800,000/$2.4 million Fund Coverage
Limits)
|
FY 2001 Surcharge
Rate
|
Added Dollar Cost At
+20%
|
Total Renewal Surcharge
Cost
|
|
OB/GYN
|
$6,552
|
$1,310
|
$7,862
|
|
Plastic Surgery
|
4,238
|
848
|
5,086
|
|
Family Practice, Surgery
(includes OB,
no C-Sections)
|
2,127
|
425
|
2,552
|
|
Neurology, No
Surgery
|
1,090
|
218
|
1,308
|
TABLE UPDATED FOR FY 2001 RATES
When does the additional 20%
Missouri surcharge rating factor become effective?
ANSWER:
The added Missouri surcharge rate modification factor will
be effective for basic professional liability insurance
policies which have effective or renewal dates on or after
July 1, 2000. If the provider's annual renewal date is
September 1st of each year, the additional surcharge
amount would be added to that provider's September 1, 2000
to September 1, 2001 Fund compliance period.
Why are
physicians who are practicing in other border states not being
subjected to this rate hike.
ANSWER:
The reason that Kansas
residents who are practicing in Nebraska, Colorado or
Oklahoma are not being required to pay an additional
surcharge amount is due to the fact that there has been only
one case filed against a Kansas resident who practiced in
one of these states since 1994. That one case was filed in
Oklahoma and did not require any loss payment from the Fund.
During the period of Fiscal Year 1994 to Fiscal Year 1999
there were 207 cases filed in Missouri in which one or more
Kansas resident health care providers were named.
What paperwork will I, or my
office, receive from the Fund?
ANSWER:
It is likely that you will
receive a questionnaire (or a supplemental statement to
complete with your normal insurance application or renewal
application) from your basic professional liability insurer
or insurance agent. The Fund will not be sending individual
statements or certifications. The Fund will rely on the
basic professional liability insurer to collect the
information, assign the proper surcharge, collect that
amount from the provider and remit the surcharge to the
Fund.
Additional information regarding the Missouri surcharge rate
modification factor will likely be included in the January 2000 and
April 2000 Fund newsletters.
Following added November 10, 2004: The
additional 20% Missouri surcharge rating factor will not be prorated
for a portion of the otherwise applicable basic coverage policy period.
This means, for example, that if a Kansas doctor who did not pay
the additional 20% Missouri surcharge rate when their basic coverage
policy was renewed and subsequently decides to practice in Missouri,
the additional 20% Missouri surcharge factor would be applied to their
entire basic coverage policy surcharge for that policy period.
(This is not a change in the related procedures. It is added for
clarification and continuity with the information published in our
April 2000 Newsletter and other implementation instructions regarding
the additional 20% Missouri surcharge rating factor.)
When might I receive a statement
that reflects the increase?
ANSWER:
It should be included in the insurance statement or billing
that you receive for your basic professional liability
coverage which has an effective or renewal date on or after
July 1, 2000.
Will the actuarial justification
be made available? How?
ANSWER:
Yes. Copies of the actuarial report are available. The
"actuarial justification" is reflected in the premium rate
differentials in existence for the major medical
professional liability insurers which utilize reasonably
similar policy provisions and write professional liability
coverage in both states. There was not a need to supplement
this existing premium rate relationship; therefore,
statistical loss evaluations were not included in the
actuarial report.* Any person may contact our office in
writing and request a copy of the latest actuarial
report.
*The 1999 actuarial report
states, "Internal Tillinghast studies show that Missouri
medical malpractice costs are approximately 20% higher than
Kansas medical malpractice costs. Based on this data, it
would seem reasonable to apply a higher level of surcharges
to Kansas residents who practice in Missouri." This
notation was added April 10, 2000.
Since there are so many unknowns,
will there be a review at some point that might show that
the plan is "overstabilized" and money might be returned or
surcharge adjusted?
ANSWER:
The only significant "unknown" is the actual number of
Kansas resident health care providers who are licensed and
rendering professional services in Missouri.
The compelling "known" in this situation is that Missouri
does not have the same tort reform measures as does Kansas.
Medical professional liability loss costs are greater in
Missouri than in Kansas as reflected in the premium rate
differentials of St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company,
The Medical Protective Company and other insurers utilizing
reasonably similar policy provisions and writing
professional liability coverage in both states.
If future annual reviews of this area of Fund surcharge
administration should indicate that professional liability
insurance premium rates and other loss cost factors have
"leveled" between the two states, then the 20% Missouri Fund
surcharge rate modification factor may be lowered to give
recognition to those factors.
Is the 20% additional Missouri
surcharge modification factor applicable to Kansas
professional corporations and other Kansas health care
provider entities that render professional services in
Missouri? Please read all of the following, including the most
recent change adopted by the Fund Board of Governors on April 7, 2005.
Notice: Note
the change made to be effective on 7-1-03. This
change was first posted to this page on 4-10-03 and
announced in our annual surcharge bulletin dated April 16,
2003. This change is based on basic coverage
insurers apparently not adjusting their
premium cost for professional corporations (and other Fund
Class Group 16 Kansas health care provider entities) that
are licensed (registered, etc.) and practicing in
Missouri.
ANSWER: UNTIL JUNE 30, 2003
-- No. Health care provider entities continue to pay a
percentage surcharge based on the premium cost of their
basic coverage. Insurers routinely adjust the premium cost
for those Kansas professional associations or other Kansas
health care provider entities that are also licensed or
registered in Missouri and rendering professional services
in Missouri.
ANSWER: ON JULY 1,
2003 -- Yes. These Kansas health care provider entities
that are licensed (registered, etc.) and practicing in
Missouri will also be subject to the 20% additional Fund
surcharge payment.
ANSWER: AS
Of April 7, 2005 -- Yes. All Kansas resident health care providers
(individuals, health care provider corporate entities, hospitals, etc.) that are licensed (registered,
otherwise authorized, etc.) and rendering professional services in
Missouri will be subject to the 20% additional Fund
surcharge payment.
Other
Supporting Information For Additional Missouri Surcharge
Modification Factor
Health
Care Stabilization Fund Kansas & Missouri Loss
Payments
|
As of
September 1999
|
JO &
WY
Counties
Kansas
|
Missouri
|
%
Greater
Than
Kansas
|
|
Average Fund Loss
Payment
|
$218,170
|
$296,366
|
+36%
|
Some
Basic Legal Differences Between Kansas & Missouri
Cases
-
Venue - Social-economic demographics of Jackson County,
Missouri
-
Cap on Non-Economic Damages - Kansas is $250,000;
Missouri is approximately $515,000 per defendant (As of September
1999)
-
Joint and Several Liability - Vicarious liability
abrogated in Kansas
|